Is the omission of stratification considered an error or injustice when authorized?

The notion of omitting stratification in authorized contexts can indeed imply that it is not inherently an error or injustice. Certain evaluations or scenarios may dictate that stratification is not necessary or relevant to the decision-making process. For instance, if the population being studied is homogeneous, stratifying the data may not provide any significant insights and could overcomplicate the analysis without adding value. Therefore, in such cases, authorized omission of stratification is acceptable and justified, as it would not detract from the integrity or accuracy of the evaluation being conducted.

Additionally, there can be situations where stratification is impractical due to limited data or resource constraints, and authorized omissions are made in the interest of efficiency and practicality, further reinforcing that not every omission is an error or injustice. Thus, the context and purpose of the evaluation play critical roles in determining the appropriateness of stratification.